Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Maxime Chazal vs Nino Serdarusic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chazal vs Serdarusic analysis and find out who is favored!
Maxime Chazal vs Nino Serdarusic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chazal 1 - 0 Serdarusic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chazal has won 46.23% of points on their second serve, while Serdarusic has won 50.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chazal, in recent form, has won 52.05% of their opponent's second serve points, while Serdarusic has won 47.18%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.56% and 30.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chazal has saved 62.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Serdarusic has saved 62.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chazal has won 56.86% of matches played (W/L 29/ 22), with Serdarusic winning 50% (W/L 27/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chazal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 412/ 242), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Serdarusic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 295/ 207), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Chazal has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.57% of matches (W/L 25/ 12), where as Serdarusic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45.95% of matches (W/L 17/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chazal winning 1 times and Serdarusic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Chazal winning 2 and Serdarusic winning 0. The last match between Chazal and Serdarusic was at the Serbia F6, 20-07-2015, Quarterfinals, Clay with Maxime Chazal getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chazal and Serdarusic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chazal winning 0 times and Serdarusic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chazal winning 0, and Serdarusic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chazal has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.53 while Serdarusic has played against players with an average rank of 404.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chazal has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Serdarusic has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chazal has converted 46.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Serdarusic has converted 43.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
561
Rank
234
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
358
Rank
167
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
60% (448-293)
Career Total W/L
54% (350-296)
58% (14-10)
YTD W/L
52% (12-11)
$2,860
Career Prize Money
$79,735
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chazal VS Serdarusic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Maxime Chazal | Nino Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Chazal VS Serdarusic H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Maxime Chazal | Nino Serdarusic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (14/10) | 52% (12/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (32/23) | 52% (28/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (275/253) | 52% (261/241) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (14/7) | 58% (11/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 38 | 93 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 30 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:46:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 163.17 | 398.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1099/1735) | 65% (1037/1607) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (755/1099) | 70% (728/1037) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (294/636) | 51% (288/570) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (78/167) | 43% (59/137) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (683/1649) | 36% (537/1477) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 74% (14/5) | 64% (7/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (14/23) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 30% (10/3) |
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Maxime Chazal
Player
Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
59%
(
61 of
104)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
49 of
67)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Theo Papamalamis
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Arthur Reymond
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Simon Beaupain
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
76 of
110)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
50 of
76)
44%
(
21 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
46 of
110)
110
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
33 of
70)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Neil Oberleitner
Player
Maxime Chazal
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Jasza Szajrych
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
74)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Noah Perfetti
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Neil Oberleitner
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nino Serdarusic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Nino Serdarusic
60%
(
52 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
94)
11
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
25 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Miguel Damas
Player
Nino Serdarusic
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve %
52%
(
13 of
25)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
30
Total Points Won
12
|
6-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
62%
(
8 of
13)
1st Serve %
75%
(
9 of
12)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
14
Total Points Won
11
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Picchione
Player
Nino Serdarusic
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Nino Serdarusic
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
38%
(
14 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Marcello Serafini
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
69%
(
52 of
75)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
30 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nino Serdarusic
Player
Stefano Reitano
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chazal Vs Serdarusic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maxime Chazal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
